NCPSSM — Its finding: The plan isn’t cost-neutral, as...

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
“Its finding: The plan isn’t cost-neutral, as Republicans claim, and would cut or withhold Social Security benefits from future generations of parents—from a 3 percent reduction in retirement benefits for parents of one child to a 10 percent for...

Its finding: The plan isn’t cost-neutral, as Republicans claim, and would cut or withhold Social Security benefits from future generations of parents—from a 3 percent reduction in retirement benefits for parents of one child to a 10 percent for parents of four children.

Urban Institute’s projections suggest that allowing people to borrow from Social Security would delay retirement benefits 20 to 25 weeks and would reduce future benefits by 3 to 10 percent. But more dramatically, borrowing against the future without creating additional revenue streams would fundamentally “undermine social security.” The Urban Institute finding is not at all surprising, given where the plan came from. 

via Slate.

We are keeping an eye on this issue.

If you want to stay updated, please sign up for our free blog alerts by clicking here.

Source: bit.ly
politics p2 social security retirement retirees retirement crisis family leave seniors elderly older americans entitlements entitlement reform earned benefits marco rubio ivanka trump social insurance

See more posts like this on Tumblr

#politics #marco rubio #ivanka trump #p2 #social security #retirement #retirees #retirement crisis #family leave #seniors #elderly #older americans #entitlements #entitlement reform #earned benefits